The 2nd Reading for
the Office of Readings on this Wednesday of the 5th Week of Easter, “From
a letter to Diognetus” and entitled “The Christian in the world” is one of my
favorites. I know that a lot of good people are shocked by news articles about the
persecution of Christians world-wide and specifically about the attacks on Catholics
here in the U.S. (this morning’s paper carried notice of the vandalism to one
of the historic Mission Churches of California) and we often respond or react by asking “why, Lord?” I think it important not to forget that here we have no lasting dwelling place. This reading
from earlier times helps me keep things in perspective today. I’d like to draw a couple things
from it for a brief comment:
“Christians are indistinguishable
from other men either by nationality, language or customs… And yet there is something extraordinary
about their lives… They live in the flesh, but they are not governed by the
desires of the flesh. They pass their days upon earth, but they are citizens of
heaven. Obedient to the laws, they yet live on a level that transcends the law.
Christians love all men, but all men persecute them. Condemned because they are
not understood, they are put to death, but raised to life again… To speak in general terms, we may say that
the Christian is to the world what the soul is to the body… The body hates the
soul and wars against it, not because of any injury the soul has done it, but
because of the restriction the soul places on its pleasures. Similarly, the
world hates the Christians, not because they have done it any wrong, but
because they are opposed to its enjoyments… The soul, though immortal, has a
mortal dwelling place; and Christians also live for a time amidst perishable
things, while awaiting the freedom from change and decay that will be theirs in
heaven. As the soul benefits from the deprivation of food and drink, so
Christians flourish under persecution. Such is the Christian’s lofty and
divinely appointed function, from which he is not permitted to excuse himself.”
Simply stated, if the world were
not persecuting us we wouldn’t be doing our job. Simply stated, Baptism implies more than a symbolic physical cleansing. Dying with Christ in the waters of Baptism in order to rise with Him in the glory of the Resurrection binds us to His path to Easter Sunday along the way of the Cross.
We balk at the shunning and the violence against us and all that is dear to us simply because our memories cannot give us the perspective we need to put these acts of aggression into context. At 61+ all my memories are of being mainstream, starting with childhood's pride in a bright and ever-so-Catholic bishop like Fulton J. Sheen. The point would be, however, that in terms of what our 2000 year trek has been, well, maybe this hiatus, let's call it a sort of honeymoon, is over and we're back to what most generations of Catholics before us have suffered.
If we would profess our love for Christ, we cannot be other than faithful sharers in His glorious Passion. We need to get over the idea that we deserve better than the blows and spittle they reserved for our Savior. By the same token, the world needs to get over the idea that we might fail to voice our opposition to their folly: "... the world hates the Christians, not because they have done it any wrong, but because they are opposed to its enjoyments."
PROPERANTES ADVENTUM DIEI DEI
I was struck by that this morning as well, al the more apropos with the "evolutionary" announcement today by President Obama. One thing I've wondered is our relationship to Israel in the Prophet Jeremiah. There Israel had to willingly take upon herself the penitential suffering for her sins. What penance must we embrace as the Church as part of our participation in the sufferings of Christ? Not just suffering but for the redemption of the body, Col 1:24?
ReplyDeleteAn excellent thought, Father! I'm going to have to think and pray about it some, because as it stands I can only see parallels with martyrdom as a grace to pray for and not take upon ourselves.
ReplyDeleteSome of what I'm reading these days suggests to me that all of us will have to make reparation for these decades in which the spirit of accommodation has held sway in the Church. I was visiting with a priest friend just the other day about how much it costs him to confront with his parish from the pulpit those issues which have been passed over in silence for decades, most notably, of course, artificial birth control. The opposition or resentment comes from those already past the childbearing age (guilty conscience), but the risk is that the conspiracy will continue in the next and next generation, if we do not confront it now, no matter the anger we provoke.
All in good measure and with prudence and compassion, of course!